What About the Hype of Forex Robots – Are They Worth It?

As the currency exchange market gets increased attention with the decline of the USD looming, so are the EA robots that attract the more sophisticated traders to the Forex game.

An Expert Advisor (EA) is a "robot" in the loose sense of the word. Robots beat humans at chess and other games, and they can also beat humans at trading. With an EA there is absolutely no emotion in effect – the most likely downfall of the human trader. An EA will observe the charts for you, implementing trades under optimal conditions and utilizing sophisticated strategies transparent to the user. This avoids the fear and greed factor, as well as lack of confidence, and inconsistency which are characteristics of most currency (and stock, option, futures) traders.

It is self-evident – over ninety percent of traders realize a net loss}. Traders are emotional humans, and like all humans, we suffer from greed, fear of loss and even fear of what other think. This impairs any traders ability no matter how experienced they are. As with all humans, in critical moments or key market conditions we lack surety, we have fear of what might happen and most importantly, we are typically inconsistent over 90% of the time.

The concept is similar to automobile manufacturing, where automotive companies use computerized robots to spray paint on new cars – a highly boring and repetitive task requiring a high degree of consistency. A human operator may spray too much paint here and too little…



by Chris J. Guli

How Could Robots Obstacle Humans?

The discussion above “if robots would overtake humans” has not long ago been heated up by warnings in opposition to the likely risk of unregulated enhancement of robots from some tutorial or industrial tremendous stars. However, what is naturally missing in these warnings is a obvious description of any sensible situation by which robots could assuredly obstacle humans as a total, not as puppets programmed and managed by humans, but as autonomous powers acting on their individual “will”. If this form of eventualities would never ever be sensible then even however we may possibly probably see robots be employed as ruthless killing equipment in close to future by terrorists, dictators and warlords as warned by the elite researchers and gurus [one], we may possibly even now not fret way too much about the so identified as demonic risk of robots as warned by some elite gurus given that it is just an additional sort of human risk in the close. However, if the form of eventualities mentioned higher than could foreseeably be understood in the true earth, then humans do require to get started stressing about how to prevent the peril from happening in its place of how to acquire debates above imaginary hazards.

The rationale that men and women on both of those sides of the discussion could not see or demonstrate a quite obvious situation that robots could indeed obstacle humans in a quite sensible way is genuinely a philosophical situation. So much all discussions on the situation have concentrated on the possibility of creating a robot that could be regarded as as a human in the sense that it could indeed believe as a human in its place of…



by [one]